Inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior: Análisis empírico y modelado predictivo con Python

Autores/as

Espinoza-Mina, Marcos Antonio
Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-7243
Colina-Vargas, Alejandra Mercedes
Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-8852

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia Artificial Generativa, Educación Superior, Percepciones Estudiantiles, Pragmatismo Crítico, Machine Learning

Sinopsis

Este estudio aborda la brecha crítica entre la rápida y masiva adopción de la inteligencia artificial generativa por parte de los estudiantes y la lenta capacidad de respuesta de las instituciones de educación superior. Para informar el desarrollo de políticas y estrategias pedagógicas efectivas, se realizó una investigación cuantitativa mediante una encuesta validada, aplicada a una muestra de 474 estudiantes universitarios en Ecuador. El análisis de datos combinó estadísticas descriptivas e inferenciales con técnicas de machine learning en Python, incluyendo el algoritmo de agrupamiento K-Means para la segmentación de perfiles y modelos de clasificación como Random Forest para la predicción. Los resultados identifican el perfil dominante del "pragmático crítico", un usuario que valora los beneficios de la IA mientras es agudamente consciente de sus riesgos, y segmentan la población en tres arquetipos (Escéptico, Pragmático Crítico y Tecno-Optimista). Además, se desarrolló un modelo que predice la intención de uso a largo plazo con un 88.1% de exactitud. Se concluye que el estudiantado expresa una demanda clara y transversal por una mayor guía institucional, recomendando a las universidades transitar de una postura reactiva a una estrategia proactiva que fomente un uso crítico y ético.

Biografía del autor/a

Espinoza-Mina, Marcos Antonio, Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC

Ingeniero en Sistemas Computacionales, Magister en Negocios Internacionales y Comercio Exterior, Magister en Sistemas de Información, Magister en Estadística Aplicada y Doctor en Administración de Empresas. Miembro de la Red de Investigación, de Conocimiento Hardware y Software Libre. Investigador Agregado 2, Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Perito del Consejo de la Judicatura en la especialidad de Ingeniería Informática o de Sistemas. Profesional multidisciplinario, con sólida formación en investigación, docencia, y liderazgo de proyectos, tanto en los ámbitos académicos como empresariales. Posee habilidades que abarcan la gestión de proyectos, las tecnologías de la información, la gestión empresarial y el análisis de datos. Ímpetu por el aprendizaje continuo y la adaptabilidad, le ha permitido destacar en diversos roles, y aplicar la experiencia para abordar desafíos, fomentando el crecimiento, tanto de los estudiantes como de las organizaciones donde ha colaborado.

Colina-Vargas, Alejandra Mercedes, Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC

Ingeniera de Sistemas, Magister en Gerencia de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación, Magister en Sistemas de Información Mención en Inteligencia de Negocios y Analítica de Datos Masivos y Doctora en Educación. Miembro de la Red de Investigación, de Conocimiento Hardware y Software Libre. Investigador Agregado 1, Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Perito del Consejo de la Judicatura en la especialidad de Ingeniería Informática o de Sistemas. Profesional con más de 20 años de experiencia, investigadora de alto nivel con habilidades y competencias para el diseño y gestión de proyectos de apropiación, desarrollo y aplicación de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación, hardware y software libre, y otras tecnologías de vanguardia, que contribuyan a los procesos de transformación social y educativa del país. Destacada en la elaboración de propuestas de analítica de datos soportadas con software específicos aplicados a instituciones de administración pública y privada.

Citas

Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., … Sallam, M. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8

Abdi, A.-N. M., Omar, A. M., Ahmed, M. H., & Ahmed, A. A. (2025). The predictors of behavioral intention to use ChatGPT for academic purposes: Evidence from higher education in Somalia. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2460250. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2460250

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Pérez Vargas, C. G., Huamaní Jordan, O., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., & Paredes Morales, A. E. (2024). Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320

Aguilos, V., & Fuchs, K. (2024). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model (eTAM) to determine university students’ behavioral intentions of ChatGPT: An empirical study from Thailand. Qwerty. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000088

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090845

Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H., & Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385

Almpanis, T., Conroy, D., & Joseph-Richard, P. (2025). Practical Implications of Generative AI on Assessment: Snapshot of Early Reactions to Assessment Redesign in an HRM and a Psychology Course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(3), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.3.3971

An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3

Bae, H., Hur, J., Park, J., Choi, G. W., & Moon, J. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ Dual Perspectives on Generative AI: Benefits, Challenges, and Integrating into Teaching and Learning. Online Learning, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4543

Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294

Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025). Determinants of ChatGPT Adoption Intention in Higher Education: Expanding on TAM with the Mediating Roles of Trust and Risk. Information, 16(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020082

Barakat, M. (2025). University Educators Perspectives on ChatGPT: A Technology Acceptance Model-Based Study. Open Praxis. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.718

Barus, O. P., Hidayanto, A. N., Handri, E. Y., Sensuse, D. I., & Yaiprasert, C. (2025). Shaping generative AI governance in higher education: Insights from student perception. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100452

Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education—A synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21501-21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x

Borges, B., Foroutan, N., Bayazit, D., Sotnikova, A., Montariol, S., Nazaretsky, T., Banaei, M., Sakhaeirad, A., Servant, P., Neshaei, S. P., Frej, J., Romanou, A., Weiss, G., Mamooler, S., Chen, Z., Fan, S., Gao, S., Ismayilzada, M., Paul, D., … EPFL Data Consortium. (2024). Could ChatGPT get an engineering degree? Evaluating higher education vulnerability to AI assistants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(49), e2414955121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414955121

Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Abdul Razak, S. F., Yogarayan, S., & Ahmed Amodu, O. (2024). An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1845. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1845

Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Rojas Guzmán, H. D. L. Á., & Fernández-Scagliusi, V. (2025). Prediction of the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Through ChatGPT Among Costa Rican University Students: A PLS Model Based on UTAUT2. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063363

Cacho, R. (2024). Integrating Generative AI in University Teaching and Learning: A Model for Balanced Guidelines. Online Learning, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4508

Cambra-Fierro, J. J., Blasco, M. F., López-Pérez, M.-E. E., & Trifu, A. (2025). ChatGPT adoption and its influence on faculty well-being: An empirical research in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12871-0

Cardona, M. A., Rodríguez, R. J., & Ishmael, K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning.

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Wüstenberg, T., Kizilcec, R., Fan, Y., Li, Y., Lu, B., Yuan, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Geldsetzer, P., Chen, S., & Bärnighausen, T. (2025). Effects of generative artificial intelligence on cognitive effort and task performance: Study protocol for a randomized controlled experiment among college students. In Review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5557709/v1

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197

Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1006. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z

Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in Generative AI Tools: A Comparative Study of Higher Education Students, Teachers, and Researchers. Information, 16(7), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622

Driessens, O., & Pischetola, M. (2024). Danish university policies on generative AI: Problems, assumptions and sustainability blind spots. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 40(76), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v40i76.143595

El-Bayaa, N., Alzoubi, Y. I., & Mishra, A. (2025). Adoption ChatGPT in higher education settings: Potentials, challenges, and paving the way for future advancements. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(5), 2940-2964. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7618

Fischer, I., Sweeney, S., Lucas, M., & Gupta, N. (2024). Making sense of generative AI for assessments: Contrasting student claims and assessor evaluations. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101081

Gallent Torres, C., Zapata González, A., & Ortego Hernando, J. L. (2023). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: Una mirada desde la ética y la integridad académica. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29134

Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062

Greiner, C., Peisl, T. C., Höpfl, F., & Beese, O. (2023). Acceptance of AI in Semi-Structured Decision-Making Situations Applying the Four-Sides Model of Communication—An Empirical Analysis Focused on Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090865

Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J.-A., Baker, P. R. A., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273

Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Support, Replacement, and Digital Literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396

Hong, H., Vate-U-Lan, P., & Viriyavejakul, C. (2025). Cognitive Offload Instruction with Generative AI: A Quasi Experimental Study on Critical Thinking Gains in English Writing. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10072

Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Examining the relationship between the L2 motivational self system and technology acceptance model post ChatGPT introduction and utilization. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100302

Iulian, Î., Roxana, V. D., Codrin Florentin, N., & Cătălin, P. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Academic Integrity of Graduation Works in Economics – Exploring Perceptions of Romanian Academia. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 58(2/2024), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/58.2.24.08

Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M. (2025). Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 89(4), 1145-1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3

Jiang, Y., Xie, L., & Cao, X. (2025). Exploring the Effectiveness of Institutional Policies and Regulations for Generative AI Usage in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(4), e70054. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70054

Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348

Kanont, K., Pingmuang, P., Simasathien, T., Wisnuwong, S., Wiwatsiripong, B., Poonpirome, K., Songkram, N., & Khlaisang, J. (2024). Generative-AI, a Learning Assistant? Factors Influencing Higher-Ed Students’ Technology Acceptance. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(6), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196

Khan, R., Qamar, Md. T., Ansari, M. S., & Yasmeen, J. (2025). Enhancing or impairing? Exploring Indian EFL learners’ academic writing narratives with ChatGPT. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2514329. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2514329

Kim, J., Klopfer, M., Grohs, J. R., Eldardiry, H., Weichert, J., Cox, L. A., & Pike, D. (2025). Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses. Innovative Higher Education, 50(4), 1281-1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w

Kizilcec, R. F., Huber, E., Papanastasiou, E. C., Cram, A., Makridis, C. A., Smolansky, A., Zeivots, S., & Raduescu, C. (2024). Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269

Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C. H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, bjet.13585. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585

Kolade, O., Owoseni, A., & Egbetokun, A. (2024). Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework. Heliyon, 10(4), e25953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953

Krzysztof, W., & Wojciech, C. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI. Economics and Business Review. Economics and Business Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743

Kurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024). Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities. Education Sciences, 14(5), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503

L. Cutillas, A. (2025). Generative AI as a catalyst for instruction in higher education: A study on relevance and effectiveness. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3185

Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178

Li, J., Jangamreddy, N. K., Hisamoto, R., Bhansali, R., Dyda, A., Zaphir, L., & Glencross, M. (2024). AI-assisted marking: Functionality and limitations of ChatGPT in written assessment evaluation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9463

Li, K. C., Chong, G. H. L., Wong, B. T. M., & Wu, M. M. F. (2025). A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment. Education Sciences, 15(7), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798

Linh, T. T. (2025). Factors influencing the use of ChatGPT in student learning in Vietnam. International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 12(7), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.07.007

Marengo, A., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2025). Development and validation of generative artificial intelligence attitude scale for students. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1528455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1528455

Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856

Moore, S., & Lookadoo, K. (2024). Communicating Clear Guidance: Advice for Generative AI Policy Development in Higher Education. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(4), 610-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241254786

Morell-Mengual, V., Fernández-García, O., Berenguer, C., Ortega-Barón, J., Gil-Llario, M. D., & Estruch-García, V. (2025). Characteristics, motivations and attitudes of students using ChatGPT and other language model-based chatbots in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13650-1

Mourtajji, L., & Arts-Chiss, N. (2024). Unleashing ChatGPT: Redefining Technology Acceptance and Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120325

Namatovu, A., & Kyambade, M. (2025). Leveraging AI in academia: University students’ adoption of ChatGPT for writing coursework (take home) assignments through the lens of UTAUT2. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2485522. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485522

Nartey, E. K. (2024). Guiding principles of generative AI for employability and learning in UK universities. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2357898. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2357898

Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., & Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: An updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 126-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154

Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643

Oc, Y., Gonsalves, C., & Quamina, L. T. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education Assessments: Examining Risk and Tech-Savviness on Student’s Adoption. Journal of Marketing Education, 47(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241302459

Oliveira, L., Tavares, C., Strzelecki, A., & Silva, M. (2025). Prompting Minds: Evaluating how Students Perceive Generative AI’s Critical Thinking Dispositions. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.2.3986

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

Pavlenko, O., & Syzenko, A. (2024). Using ChatGPT as a Learning Tool: A Study of Ukrainian Students’ Perceptions. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.17

Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1

Rudolph, J., Mohamed Ismail, F. M., & Popenici, S. (2024). Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/54fs5e77

Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., Barakat, M., El Khatib, S., Ghach, W., Alwan, N., Hallit, S., & Malaeb, D. (2024). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: A study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1414758. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758

Sergeeva, O. V., Masalimova, A. R., Zheltukhina, M. R., Chikileva, L. S., Lutskovskai, L. Yu., & Luzin, A. (2025). Impact of digital media literacy on attitude toward generative AI acceptance in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1563148. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1563148

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x

Shanto, S. S., Ahmed, Z., & Jony, A. I. (2023). PAIGE: A generative AI-based framework for promoting assignment integrity in higher education. STEM Education, 3(4), 288-305. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2023018

Shata, A., & Hartley, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: Faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7

Shi, J., Liu, W., & Hu, K. (2025). Exploring How AI Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning Relate to Student Writing Performance and Well-Being in Generative AI-Supported Higher Education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050705

Singh, R. G., & Ngai, C. S. B. (2024). Top-ranked U.S. and U.K.’s universities’ first responses to GenAI: Key themes, emotions, and pedagogical implications for teaching and learning. Discover Education, 3(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00211-w

Smit, M., Wagner, R. F., & Bond-Barnard, T. J. (2025). Ambiguous regulations for dealing with AI in higher education can lead to moral hazards among students. Project Leadership and Society, 6, 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2025.100187

Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students. Electronics, 14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258

Szűts, Z., Lengyelné Molnár, T., Racskó, R., Vaughan, G., Ceglédi, S., & Dominek, D. (2025). Examining the Flow Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence in Real-Time Classroom Applications. Computers, 14(7), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070275

Tala, M. L., Muller, C. N., Nastase, I. A., State, O., & Gheorghe, G. (2024). Exploring University Students Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education. Amfiteatru Economic, 26(65), 71. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2024/65/71

Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: Investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z

Van Den Berg, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. M. J., & Sutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326

Wang, L., & Ren, B. (2024). Enhancing Academic Writing in a Linguistics Course with Generative AI: An Empirical Study in a Higher Education Institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329

Wu, C., Zhang, H., & Carroll, J. M. (2024). AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities. Future Internet, 16(10), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16100354

Wu, Q., Tian, J., & Liu, Z. (2025). Exploring the usage behavior of generative artificial intelligence: A case study of ChatGPT with insights into the moderating effects of habit and personal innovativeness. Current Psychology, 44(9), 8190-8203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07193-w

Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, Muhd., Zakiyah, M., Syafitri, W., Nusi, A., & Hardiah, M. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x


Flag Counter

Descargas

Publicado

25 November 2025

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Themes by Openjournaltheme.com

Como citar